4.7 Article

Assessment of the impact of climate variability and human activities on the runoff in five catchments of the Adriatic Coast of south-central Italy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100712

关键词

Climate change; Human activities; Hydrological model; Climate elasticity; Runoff

资金

  1. scientific project Building Resilience to flood Impact Deriving from Global warming in Europe (BRIDGE) - Polytechnic University of Marche Internal Program 2017/2018

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study region: South-central Italy. Study focus: A detailed analysis is carried out in five catchments in the Adriatic Coast where a complex system of artificial lakes, forced conducts and hydropower stations has modified the river regime. This together with the decrease of the annual rainfall in central Italy, make quantifying the relative contributions of human activities and climatic variability to streamflow change a challenging task. Statistically significant trends in annual rainfall and streamflow and change points in runoff have been investigated. Potential changes in precipitation-runoff relationship have been examined and a quantitative evaluation of the effect of climate variability and human activities on runoff has been assessed separately. New hydrological insights for the region: Significant negative trends in runoff have been found in all the catchments, except the Feltrino river. Precipitation also exhibits negative trend, except the Pescara basin. Significant change points in runoff were detected in all the basins and the study period was divided in a pre-change and a post-change period. By climate elasticity method the climatic variability seems to be the main driving factor of the runoff decrease. Only for the Pescara river human activities were dominant factors of the runoff reduction, as expected from the absence of any significant trend in the annual precipitation. The hydrological model confirms this result, although the assessment of two contributions is affected by some uncertainties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据