4.7 Article

Characterization and microhardness of Ni-W-P coatings electrodeposited with gluconate bath

期刊

SURFACES AND INTERFACES
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100769

关键词

Electrodeposition; Gluconate bath; Ni-W-P coatings; Structure; XPS; Microhardness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni-W-P coatings electrodeposited from an acid gluconate bath were characterized by various physicochemical techniques. The addition of phosphorus influenced the amorphous structure of the coatings, while different deposition modes affected the structure, morphology, and elemental oxidation states. Heat treatment at different temperatures resulted in a substantial increase in microhardness comparable to hard chromium coating.
Ni-W-P coatings are electrodeposited from an acid gluconate bath and the effect of P addition to deposits is characterized by various physicochemical techniques. The effect of direct current (DC) and pulse current (PC) deposition modes on the structure, morphology, surface roughness, and elemental oxidation states of Ni-W-P coatings is studied in detail. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Ni-W-P coatings display the formation of an amorphous structure, which is influenced by the addition of phosphorus. Results obtained from field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images reveal the appearance of homogeneous coarse nodular morphology for electrodeposited Ni-W-P coatings devoid of cracks. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies of Ni-W-P coatings indicate the presence of metallic and oxidized Ni species in DC-plated coatings, whereas oxidized Ni species dominate in PC-plated coatings. Microhardness of as-deposited DC Ni-W-P coatings increases as the phosphorus content increases, whereas the microhardness is similar for all PC Ni-W-P coatings. The effect of heat treatment on the structure and microhardness of the deposits carried at different temperatures shows a substantial increase in microhardness which is comparable with hard chromium coating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据