4.6 Article

Discrete imperialist competitive algorithm for the resource-constrained hybrid flowshop problem with energy consumption

期刊

COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 311-326

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-020-00193-w

关键词

Hybrid flowshop; Imperialist competitive algorithm; Resource-constrained

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61773192, 61803192, 61773246]
  2. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J17KZ005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research on resource-constrained hybrid flowshop problem led to the proposal of a discrete imperialist competitive algorithm (DICA) to minimize makespan and energy consumption. The algorithm represents solutions using two-dimensional vectors, with one for scheduling sequence and the other for machine assignment, and incorporates a decoding method considering resource allocation. By combining DICA with simulated annealing algorithm (SA), the proposed approach showed high efficiency in solving the RCHFS problem.
The resource-constrained hybrid flowshop problem (RCHFS) has been investigated thoroughly in recent years. However, the practical case that considers both resource-constrained and energy consumption still has rare research. To address this issue, a discrete imperialist competitive algorithm (DICA) was proposed to minimize the makespan and energy consumption. In the proposed algorithm, first, each solution was represented by a two-dimensional vector, where one vector represented the scheduling sequence and another one showed the machine assignment. Then, a decoding method considering the resource allocation was designed. Finally, we combined DICA and the simulated annealing algorithm (SA) to improve the performance of the proposed approach. Furthermore, we tested the proposed algorithm based on a randomly generated set of real shop scheduling system instances and compared with the existing heuristic algorithms. The results confirmed that the proposed algorithm can solve the RCHFS with high efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据