4.7 Article

Genetic control of CCL24, POR, and IL23R contributes to the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01185-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Society of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders
  2. Study Group on Diffuse Pulmonary Disorders from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [24790338, 26860226, 25861643]
  4. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology
  5. Czech government [NV18-05-00134]
  6. Palacky University [IGA_PU_LF 2018_015, 2019_009]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25861643, 26860226, 24790338] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcoidosis is a genetically complex systemic inflammatory disease that affects multiple organs. We present a GWAS of a Japanese cohort (700 sarcoidosis cases and 886 controls) with replication in independent samples from Japan (931 cases and 1,042 controls) and the Czech Republic (265 cases and 264 controls). We identified three loci outside the HLA complex, CCL24, STYXL1-SRRM3, and C1orf141-IL23R, which showed genome-wide significant associations (P<5.0x10(-8)) with sarcoidosis; CCL24 and STYXL1-SRRM3 were novel. The disease-risk alleles in CCL24 and IL23R were associated with reduced CCL24 and IL23R expression, respectively. The disease-risk allele in STYXL1-SRRM3 was associated with elevated POR expression. These results suggest that genetic control of CCL24, POR, and IL23R expression contribute to the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis. We speculate that the CCL24 risk allele might be involved in a polarized Th1 response in sarcoidosis, and that POR and IL23R risk alleles may lead to diminished host defense against sarcoidosis pathogens. Akira Meguro et al. report a genome-wide association study for sarcoidosis-a systemic inflammatory disease-in the Japanese population. They identify 3 non-HLA loci with genome-wide significance, 2 of which have not been previously associated with sarcoidosis in any population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据