4.7 Article

Wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) genomic analysis reveals putative cryptic species, population structure, and adaptation to pest control

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01169-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH COBRE grant [P30GM103324]
  2. NIH [S10 OD018174]
  3. Idaho Wheat Commission [6625]
  4. Idaho Barley Commission [AN2685]
  5. Oregon Potato Commission [ARF 7252]
  6. National Science Foundation [OIA-1757324]
  7. University of Idaho - Open Access Publishing Fund
  8. [USDA-NIFA-Hatch-IDA01506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The larvae of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae), known as wireworms, are agricultural pests that pose a substantial economic threat worldwide. We produced one of the first wireworm genome assemblies (Limonius californicus), and investigated population structure and phylogenetic relationships of three species (L. californicus, L. infuscatus, L. canus) across the northwest US and southwest Canada using genome-wide markers (RADseq) and genome skimming. We found two species (L. californicus and L. infuscatus) are comprised of multiple genetically distinct groups that diverged in the Pleistocene but have no known distinguishing morphological characters, and therefore could be considered cryptic species complexes. We also found within-species population structure across relatively short geographic distances. Genome scans for selection provided preliminary evidence for signatures of adaptation associated with different pesticide treatments in an agricultural field trial for L. canus. We demonstrate that genomic tools can be a strong asset in developing effective wireworm control strategies. Andrews et al. sequenced and assembled the genome of a wireworm, or click beetle (Limonius californicus), an agricultural pest. Their data suggest the presence of multiple genetically distinct cryptic species in addition to population structure and a local adaptive response to pesticide use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据