4.6 Article

Quantification of amyloid fibril polymorphism by nano-morphometry reveals the individuality of filament assembly

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS CHEMISTRY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s42004-020-00372-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Kent
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK [BB/S003312/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK DTP grant [EP/R513246/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/S003312/1, BB/S003657/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. EPSRC [2119785] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid fibrils are highly polymorphic structures formed by many different proteins. They provide biological function but also abnormally accumulate in numerous human diseases. The physicochemical principles of amyloid polymorphism are not understood due to lack of structural insights at the single-fibril level. To identify and classify different fibril polymorphs and to quantify the level of heterogeneity is essential to decipher the precise links between amyloid structures and their functional and disease associated properties such as toxicity, strains, propagation and spreading. Employing gentle, force-distance curve-based AFM, we produce detailed images, from which the 3D reconstruction of individual filaments in heterogeneous amyloid samples is achieved. Distinctive fibril polymorphs are then classified by hierarchical clustering, and sample heterogeneity is objectively quantified. These data demonstrate the polymorphic nature of fibril populations, provide important information regarding the energy landscape of amyloid self-assembly, and offer quantitative insights into the structural basis of polymorphism in amyloid populations. A single amyloid-forming protein or peptide can adopt many different fibrillar 3D structures, but this polymorphism is poorly understood. Here, detailed AFM imaging allows for the reconstruction of 3D models of individual fibrils which can be clustered on the basis of their individual structural properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据