4.1 Article

The nexin link and B-tubule glutamylation maintain the alignment of outer doublets in the ciliary axoneme

期刊

CYTOSKELETON
卷 73, 期 7, 页码 331-340

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cm.21301

关键词

cilia; axoneme; doublet microtubule; nexin; dynein; dynein regulatory complex; DRC; N-DRC

资金

  1. NIH (Emory University FIRST Postdoctoral Career Development Award) [K12 GM000608]
  2. American Heart Association
  3. Department of Pediatrics
  4. Pediatric Research Center
  5. Children's Hospital of Atlanta (CHOA) [NIAAA P50 AA013757 10 pilot project 00006748]
  6. NIH [NIH GM051173, GM-055667, GM083122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed quantitative assays to test the hypothesis that the N-DRC is required for integrity of the ciliary axoneme. We examined reactivated motility of demembranated drc cells, commonly termed reactivated cell models. ATP-induced reactivation of wild-type cells resulted in the forward swimming of approximate to 90% of cell models. ATP-induced reactivation failed in a subset of drc cell models, despite forward motility in live drc cells. Dark-field light microscopic observations of drc cell models revealed various degrees of axonemal splaying. In contrast, >98% of axonemes from wild-type reactivated cell models remained intact. The sup-pf4 and drc3 mutants, unlike other drc mutants, retain most of the N-DRC linker that interconnects outer doublet microtubules. Reactivated sup-pf4 and drc3 cell models displayed nearly wild-type levels of forward motility. Thus, the N-DRC linker is required for axonemal integrity. We also examined reactivated motility and axoneme integrity in mutants defective in tubulin polyglutamylation. ATP-induced reactivation resulted in forward swimming of >75% of tpg cell models. Analysis of double mutants defective in tubulin polyglutamylation and different regions of the N-DRC indicate B-tubule polyglutamylation and the distal lobe of the linker region are both important for axonemal integrity and normal N-DRC function. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据