4.7 Article

Tailoring Submicron Cobblestone-Like Carbon-Free CoSe2 with High Energy Density for Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 9558-9567

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c00236

关键词

submicron CoSe2; cobblestone-like; carbon-free; high energy density; anode

资金

  1. Key Project of Guangdong Province Nature Science Foundation [2017B030311013]
  2. Scientific and Technological Plan of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou and Qingyuan City, China [2019B090905005, 2019B090911004, 2017B020227009, 201804010169, 2019DZX008, 2019A004]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1502600]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51922042, 51872098]
  5. Sino-Singapore International Joint Research Institute (SSIJRI), Guangzhou, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CoSe2 with high theoretical capacity has drawn massive attention as an ideal anode material for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). However, developing a CoSe2 anode with high energy density to satisfy the practical application remains a very intractable challenge. Here, a carbon-free and compact submicron cobblestonelike CoSe2 anode material was designed and synthesized, which can promote tap density via eliminating the introduction of carbon species, nanostructure, and hollow construction. Benefiting from the contribution of partial pseudocapacitive contributes, CoSe2 displays high reversible capacity, outstanding rate property, and durable cycling stability (414.6 mAh g(-1) after 700 loops at 0.2 A g(-1) and 416.5 mAh g(-1) after 1350 loops even at 2 A g(-1)). The enhanced tap density and remarkable sodium storage capability greatly improved volumetric energy density and gravimetric energy density and, subsequently, energy density. Meanwhile, ex situ XRD and Raman measurements were utilized to further understand the sodium storage mechanism of as-prepared CoSe2. This work opens up a new opportunity regarding the practical application of the CoSe2 anode with high energy density in SIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据