4.6 Review

Electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction on cost-effective oxide-derived copper and transition metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 65-73

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.04.005

关键词

Carbon dioxide electrochemical reduction reaction; Electrocatalysis; Oxide-derived copper catalysts; Transition metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts; Value-added products

资金

  1. Sorbonne Universite - China Scholarship Council program 2017
  2. Labex Matisse program [ASDB/2017-12]
  3. ECOS Sud-Chile CONICYT program [C17E10]
  4. Programa Operacional Regional de Lisboa, na componente FEDER [PTDC/EQU-EPQ/29579/2017]
  5. Fundacao para a Cie<^>ncia e Tecnologia, I.P [PTDC/EQU-EPQ/29579/2017]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under Ramo'n y Cajal program [RYC-2015-17080]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EQU-EPQ/29579/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) either to generate multicarbon (C2+) or single carbon (C-1) value-added products provides an effective and promising approach to mitigate the high CO2 concentration in the atmosphere and promote energy storage. However, cost-effectiveness of catalytic materials limits practical application of this technology in the short term. Herein, we summarize and discuss recent and advanced works on cost-effective oxide-derived copper catalysts for the generation of C2+ products (hydrocarbons and alcohols) and transition metal-nitrogen-doped carbon electrocatalytic materials for C-1 compounds production from CO2RR. We think they represent suitable electrocatalyst candidates for scaling up electrochemical CO2 conversion. This short review may provide inspiration for the future design and development of innovative active, cost-effective, selective and stable electrocatalysts with improved properties for either the production of C2+ (alcohols, hydrocarbons) or carbon monoxide from CO2RR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据