4.8 Article

Revealing the multilevel thermal safety of lithium batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 72-86

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.004

关键词

Lithium batteries; Thermal safety; Multilevel; Accelerating rate calorimetry; Perspectives; Contents

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0104300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1706229]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA22010604]
  4. Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong [2017CXZC0505]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2017253]
  6. Qingdao Key Lab of Solar Energy Utilization and Energy Storage Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ever-growing endurance mileage anxiety has been stimulating the continuous energy density raising of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) and the burgeoning of battery chemistries beyond Li-ion. However, if operated under abuse conditions, LIBs are easy to get thermal runaway. Encouragingly, great efforts have been devoting for achieving safer LIBs. However, the pace of thermal safety assessment has obviously lagged behind the energy density improvement of LIBs. Therefore, it is urgently needed to systematically, comprehensively and timely study the thermal safety issue of LIBs by combining different testing methods. In this review, we briefly summarize the varied testing methods for thermal safety evaluation of LIBs. Wherein, the highly-integrated accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC, an adiabatic calorimeter) technology is widely used to study the worst case thermal safety of LIBs at multilevel, ranging from ranging from battery materials to single cells and even battery packs. Combined with examples, the realizable specific functions of ARC in evaluating the thermal safety of LIBs are systematically summarized, and it reveals that the thermal safety of LIBs are rather complicated. Finally, critical perspectives in studying and improving thermal safety of LIBs and battery chemistries beyond Li-ion are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据