4.4 Article

Effects of supplementing hen diet with Lavandula angustifolia and/or Mentha spicata essential oils on production performance, egg quality and blood variables of laying hens

期刊

VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 184-193

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/vms3.343

关键词

blood variables; egg production; herbal additives; laying performance; morphometric egg traits; phytogenic feed additives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that using lavender and/or mint essential oils did not significantly impact the performance and egg quality of laying hens, but mint essential oil alone increased feed conversion ratio and decreased egg production compared to lavender. Lavender essential oil was more effective in increasing egg production.
Background: Organic products of animals are getting more accepted by consumers. Using herbal additives may lead to more health animal products. In this research it is hypothesized thatLavandula angustifoliaand/orMentha spicataessential oils would be helpful to enhance production performance in laying hens. Objectives: This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects ofLavandula angustifoliaandMentha spicataessential oils on performance, egg traits and blood variables in laying hens. Methods: 144 Lohmann LSL-Lite laying hens from 42 until 56 weeks of age were used in a completely randomized design in four treatments and six replicates (six birds per replicate). The treatments consisted of: (a) control group (basal diet), (b) basal diet supplemented with 250 mg/kg diet lavender essential oil (LEO), (c) basal diet supplemented with 250 mg/kg diet mint essential oil (MEO), and (d) basal diet supplemented with both LEO and MEO. Results: Using LEO and/or MEO did not affect body weight changes, feed intake, egg weight, egg index, yolk index, Haugh unit, egg shell weight and egg shell thickness. Feeding LEO, individually or in combination with MEO, did not affect FCR compared with the control group (p < .05), however, feeding MEO individually increased feed conversation ratio (FCR) compared to LEO and the control group during 42-56 weeks (p < .05), as well as decreasing egg mass compared to LEO (p < .05). Feeding LEO increased egg production compared to MEO and combination of MEO and LEO (p < .05). Conclusions: In conclusion, dietary supplemental MEO (250 mg/kg) may increase FCR, and LEO (250 mg/kg) is more effective than MEO (250 mg/kg) for egg production and egg mass purposes; besides MEO (250 mg/kg) negatively affected FCR compared with the control group. In addition, no specific beneficial effect of dietary supplemental MEO and/or LEO on the other measured variables was detected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据