4.6 Article

Phasing amplicon sequencing on Illumina Miseq for robust environmental microbial community analysis

期刊

BMC MICROBIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-015-0450-4

关键词

Next generation sequencing; Low diversity sample; Amplicon sequencing; Illumina Miseq; Microbial community; Phasing primer; Microbial ecology

资金

  1. OBER Biological Systems Research on the Role of Microbial Communities in Carbon Cycling Program [DE-SC0010715]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation MacroSystems Biology program [NSF EF-1065844]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although high-throughput sequencing, such as Illumina-based technologies (e.g. MiSeq), has revolutionized microbial ecology, adaptation of amplicon sequencing for environmental microbial community analysis is challenging due to the problem of low base diversity. Results: A new phasing amplicon sequencing approach (PAS) was developed by shifting sequencing phases among different community samples from both directions via adding various numbers of bases (0-7) as spacers to both forward and reverse primers. Our results first indicated that the PAS method substantially ameliorated the problem of unbalanced base composition. Second, the PAS method substantially improved the sequence read base quality (an average of 10 % higher of bases above Q30). Third, the PAS method effectively increased raw sequence throughput (similar to 15 % more raw reads). In addition, the PAS method significantly increased effective reads (9-47 %) and the effective read sequence length (16-96 more bases) after quality trim at Q30 with window 5. In addition, the PAS method reduced half of the sequencing errors (0.54-1.1 % less). Finally, two-step PCR amplification of the PAS method effectively ameliorated the amplification biases introduced by the long barcoded PCR primers. Conclusion: The developed strategy is robust for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. In addition, a similar strategy could also be used for sequencing other genes important to ecosystem functional processes

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据