4.4 Article

Organizational Climate Effects on the Relationship Between Emotional Labor and Turnover Intention in Korean Fire fighters

期刊

SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 479-484

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.08.007

关键词

Emotional labor; Firefighters; Organizational climate; Turnover intention

资金

  1. Fire Fighting Safety & 119 Rescue Technology Research and Development Program - National Fire Agency [MPSS-2015-80]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The purpose of this study is to examine the combined effects of organizational climate (OC) with emotional labor (EL) on turnover intention in Korean firefighters. Methods: The data were obtained from the study Firefighters Research: Enhancement of Safety and Health. A total of 4,860 firefighters whose main duty was providing emergency medical aid were included. To examine the effects of OC on the relationships between five subscales of EL and turnover intention, four groups were created using various combinations of OC (good vs. bad) and EL (normal vs. risk): (1) good and normal (Group I), (2) bad and normal (Group II), (3) good and risk (Group III), and (4) bad and risk (Group IV). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of turnover intention for the combinations of OC and EL. Results: The results showed turnover intention was significantly higher in the group with bad OC (17.7%) than in that with good OC (7.6%). Combined effects of OC and EL on turnover intention were found in all five subscales with the exception of Group I for emotional demands and regulation. Groups II, III, and IV were more likely to experience risks of turnover intention than Group I (p for trend <0.001). Conclusions: A positive and cooperative OC plays a role in decreasing the risk of turnover intention and in attenuating the negative effects of EL on turnover intention in firefighters. (C) 2020 Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据