4.7 Article

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Ice Algal Trophic Markers-With Recommendations about Their Application

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8090676

关键词

trophic marker; lipid; fatty acid; highly branched isoprenoid (HBI); IP25; H-Print; stable isotope ratio; compound-specific isotope analysis

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [243702]
  2. Svalbard Science Forum
  3. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MNiSW)
  4. flagship program Ocean Acidification and effects in northern waters within the FRAM-High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing the relative importance of sea ice algal-based production is often vital for studies about climate change impacts on Arctic marine ecosystems. Several types of lipid biomarkers and stable isotope ratios are widely used for tracing sea ic-associated (sympagic) vs. pelagic particulate organic matter (POM) in marine food webs. However, there has been limited understanding about the plasticity of these compounds in space and time, which constrains the robustness of some of those approaches. Furthermore, some of the markers are compromised by not being unambiguously specific for sea ice algae, whereas others might only be produced by a small sub-group of species. We analyzed fatty acids, highly branched isoprenoids (HBIs), stable isotope ratios of particulate organic carbon (POC) (delta C-13), as well as delta C-13 of selected fatty acid markers during an Arctic sea ice algal bloom, focusing on spatial and temporal variability. We found remarkable differences between these approaches and show that inferences about bloom characteristics might even be contradictory between markers. The impact of environmental factors as causes of this considerable variability is highlighted and explained. We emphasize that awareness and, in some cases, caution is required when using lipid and stable isotope markers as tracers in food web studies and offer recommendations for the proper application of these valuable approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据