4.6 Article

Investigation on electrical properties of polyvinyl acetate/graphite adhesive by joule heating and hall effect tests

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101680

关键词

Carbon adhesive; NTC/PTC effect; Joule heating effect; Hall effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PTC/NTC behavior of conductive adhesive was investigated through Hall Effect and Joule heating tests, revealing two physical mechanisms for the NTC behavior of carbon adhesives.
decreasing and increasing electrical resistivity of materials by increasing temperature named Negative thermal coefficient (NTC) and positive thermal coefficient (PTC), respectively, are two critical properties for thermistor materials. In this research, the PTC/NTC behavior of conductive adhesive are investigated by performing two tests: Hall Effect and Joule heating tests. In Hall Effect, the temperature increases by the heating element, while in Joule Heating, the ohmic resistance of adhesive leads to increasing the temperature. The adhesives are made of polyvinyl acetate as binder and 40, 50, 60, and 70 wt.% Graphite (G) as filler. Characterizations include the lap-shear strength, electrical conductivity, and Archimedes porosimetry tests, as well as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis to investigate the change of chemical composition and crystallinity of carbon adhesives before and after the Joule Heating test. There are little information about the physical mechanisms of NTC/PTC behavior in literature. NTC behavior of carbon adhesives is interpreted by two physical mechanisms. The first is based on increasing temperature on the regions named hot spots, thereby decomposing polymer to amorphous Carbon (validate by experimental analyses) and the second, decreasing polymer viscosity and, consequently, s rotating and aligning the G particles, validated by mathematical modeling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据