4.7 Article

Assessment of energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions in low rise building systems: Case study of five building systems built after the Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101831

关键词

Life cycle assessment; Construction materials; Low rise building system; Energy consumption; CO2 emission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed energy consumption and CO2 emissions in five low rise building systems used for reconstruction after Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal hilly regions. The results showed that Reinforced Cement Concrete system has higher energy demand and CO2 emissions compared to Compressed Stabilized Earth Block system.
Buildings are responsible for significant energy consumption and greenhouse gases (GHG) emission. This study aims to assess energy consumption and CO2 emission in five low rise building systems of buildings used for the reconstruction of earthquake-resistant houses in hilly regions of Nepal after Gorkha Earthquake. The Ecoinvent dataset version 3.5 and software tool OpenLCA version 1.8 has been used to assess the energy consumption and CO2 emission due to the construction of the buildings after the earthquake. The study considers four stages of lifecycle assessment starting from firstly, material production and transportation stage; secondly, the construction of the building stage; thirdly, operation of the building stage to finally, demolition stage of the residential buildings with different construction materials. The results of the study show that Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) system demands 1.69 times higher energy than the Compressed Stabilized Earth Block (CSEB) system, whereas, the RCC system emits 1.64 times higher CO2 equivalent emission than Interlocking Block (IB) building system throughout their lifecycle. This outcome of the study would be useful to the policymakers to choose the right structural system of the building with appropriate construction materials for the construction of houses which will give less impact on the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据