4.7 Review

Review on biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) technology in geotechnical engineering practices

期刊

TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100385

关键词

Biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST); Ground improvement; Soil stabilization; Geotechnical engineering properties; Site application

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) [20AWMP-B114119-05]
  2. Construction Technology Research Program [20SCIP-B105148-06]
  3. MOLIT
  4. University of New South Wales (UNSW) Canberra [UNSW PS51230]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [4199990614407] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various applications of biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) in geotechnical engineering have been implemented in recent years, including dust control, soil strengthening and erosion control. Despite BPST methods can ensure the effectiveness of engineering while meeting environmental protection requirements, BPST technology requires further validation in terms of site applicability, durability, and economic feasibility. This study aims to provide a state-of-the-art review and future prospective of BPST. Current biopolymer types, engineered and assessed in laboratory scales, are described along with site implementation attempts. The effect of biopolymers on soil behavior is reviewed with regard to geotechnical engineering application and practice, including soil consistency limits, strength parameters, hydraulic conductivity, soil-water characteristics, and erosion control. The economic feasibility and sustainability of BPST application in ground improvement and earth stabilization practices is discussed. This review postulates biopolymers to be a promising new, environmentally friendly ground improvement material for geotechnical and construction engineering practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据