4.6 Article

Predicting Marian Plum Fruit Quality without Environmental Condition Impact by Handheld Visible-Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 5, 期 43, 页码 27909-27921

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03203

关键词

-

资金

  1. Khon Kaen University research fund, Khon Kaen, Thailand
  2. NIRS Research Center for Agricultural Products and Food at the Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology located at Ladkrabang in Bangkok, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Handheld near-infrared spectroscopy was used to study the effect of integration time and wavelength selection on predicting marian plum quality including soluble solids content (SSC), the potential of hydrogen ion (pH), and titratable acidity (TA). For measurements representing actual conditions, the on-tree fruits were scanned under in-field conditions. The assumption was that the robust model might be achieved when the models were developed under actual conditions. The results of the main effect test show that the integration time did not statistically affect SSC, pH, and TA predictions (p-value > 0.05) and the wavelength range had a significant impact on prediction (p-value < 0.01). An integration time of 30 ms coupled with a wavelength range of 670-1000 nm was the optimal conditions for the SSC prediction, while an integration time of 20 ms with 670-1000 nm wavelength was optimal for pH and TA prediction because of the lowest root-mean-square error of cross-validation (RMSECV). The optimal models for SSC, pH, and TA could be improved using spectral preprocessing of multiplicative scatter correction. The effective models for SSC, pH, and TA improved and reported the coefficients of determination (r(2)) and root-mean-square errors of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.66 and 0.86 degrees Brix; 0.79 and 0.15; and 0.71 and 1.91%, respectively. The SSC, pH, and TA models could be applied for quality assurance. These models benefit the orchardist for on-tree measurement before harvesting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据