4.6 Article

An Assessment of the Molecular Diversity of Ticks and Tick-Borne Microorganisms of Small Ruminants in Pakistan

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8091428

关键词

tick; Anaplasma; goat; Haemaphysalis; microfluidic real-time PCR; Rhipicephalus; Rickettsia; sheep; Theileria; Pakistan

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated ticks and tick-borne microorganisms of small ruminants from five districts of the Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) of Pakistan. Morphological (n= 104) and molecular (n= 54) characterization of the ticks revealed the presence of six ixodid ticks:Rhipicephalus(Rh.)haemaphysaloides,Rh. microplus,Rh. turanicus,Haemaphysalis(Hs.)punctata,Hs. sulcataandHyalomma anatolicum. Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequence data for two mitochondrial (16S and cytochromecoxidase 1) and one nuclear (second internal transcribed spacer) DNA regions provided strong support for the grouping of the six tick species identified in this study. Microfluidic real-time PCR, employing multiple pre-validated nuclear and mitochondrial genetic markers, detected 11 potential pathogens and endosymbionts in 72.2% of the ticks (n= 54) tested.Rickettsia(R.)massiliaewas the most common pathogen found (42.6% of ticks) followed byTheileriaspp. (33.3%),Anaplasma(A.)ovisandR. slovaca(25.9% each).Anaplasma centrale,A. marginale,Ehrlichiaspp.,R. aeschlimannii,R. conoriiand endosymbionts (Francisella- andCoxiella-like) were detected at much lower rates (1.9-22.2%) in ticks. Ticks from goats (83.9%) carried significantly higher microorganisms than those from sheep (56.5%). This study demonstrates that ticks of small ruminants from the FATA are carrying multiple microorganisms of veterinary and medical health significance and provides the basis for future investigations of ticks and tick-borne diseases of animals and humans in this and neighboring regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据