4.7 Article

Insight into the Anticancer Activity of Copper(II) 5-Methylenetrimethylammonium-Thiosemicarbazonates and Their Interaction with Organic Cation Transporters

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom10091213

关键词

thiosemicarbazones; copper(II) complexes; cytotoxicity; organic cation transporters (OCT1-3); inhibitors

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28223]
  2. Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office-NKFIA [FK 124240]
  3. COST Action, NECTAR-Network for Equilibria and Chemical Thermodynamics Advanced Research supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA18202]
  4. FIKP program (Hungary) [TUDFO/47138-1/2019-ITM, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00038]
  5. Slovak Grant Agency APVV [APVV-15-0053, APVV-19-0024, DS-FR-19-0035]
  6. Slovak Grant Agency VEGA [1/0504/20, 1/0466/18]
  7. OeAD [SK18/2018]
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28223] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of four water-soluble salicylaldehyde thiosemicarbazones with a positively charged trimethylammonium moiety ([H2L (R)]Cl, R = H, Me, Et, Ph) and four copper(II) complexes [Cu(HL (R))Cl]Cl (1-4) were synthesised with the aim to study (i) their antiproliferative activity in cancer cells and, (ii) for the first time for thiosemicarbazones, the interaction with membrane transport proteins, specifically organic cation transporters OCT1-3. The compounds were comprehensively characterised by analytical, spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction methods. The highest cytotoxic effect was observed in the neuroblastoma cell line SH-5YSY after 24 h exposure and follows the rank order:3>2>4>cisplatin>1>> [H2L (R)]Cl. The copper(II) complexes showed marked interaction with OCT1-3, comparable to that of well-known OCT inhibitors (decynium 22, prazosin and corticosterone) in the cell-based radiotracer uptake assays. The work paves the way for the development of more potent and selective anticancer drugs and/or OCT inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据