4.4 Article

Differential effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and low-carbohydrate diet on body composition and metabolic profile in obese diabetic db/db mice

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001303

关键词

sodium glucose cotransporter; insulin secretion; fatty liver; carbohydrates

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K09827, JP19K11760, JP19K07927, JP19K07905, JP18H02737]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP18K19769]
  3. Smoking Research Foundation [2019T004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Treatment using sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitor and low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) for obesity and type 2 diabetes are similar in terms of carbohydrate limitation. However, their mechanisms of action differ, and the effects on the body remain unclear. We investigated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor and LCD on body composition and metabolic profile using thedb/dbmouse model for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Research design and methods Eight-week-old maledb/dbmice were divided into four groups: mice receiving normal diet and vehicle or canagliflozin (Cana) administration and mice receiving LCD and vehicle or Cana administration for 8 weeks. Consumed calories were adjusted to be equal among the groups. Results Both Cana administration and LCD feeding resulted in significant weight gain. Cana administration significantly decreased plasma glucose levels and increased plasma insulin levels with preservation of pancreatic beta cells. However, LCD feeding did not improve plasma glucose levels but deteriorated insulin sensitivity. LCD feeding significantly reduced liver weight and hepatic triglyceride content; these effects were not observed with Cana administration. Combined treatment with LCD did not lead to an additive increase in blood beta-ketone levels. Conclusions SGLT2 inhibitors and LCD exert differential effects on the body. Their combined use may achieve better metabolic improvements in obesity and type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据