4.7 Review

Plasma Membrane Pores Drive Inflammatory Cell Death

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00817

关键词

necroptosis; pyroptosis; MLKL; GSDMD; regulated cell death; necroinflammation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG, German Research Foundation] [400339789 (KR 1690/6-1)]
  2. Dr. Werner Jackstadt-Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Necroptosis and pyroptosis are two forms of regulated cell death. They are executed by the proteins mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) and gasdermin D (GSDMD), respectively. Once activated by numerous pathways, these proteins form membrane pores that allow the influx and efflux of various ions, proteins, and water, ultimately resulting in the death of the cell. These modalities of cell death are considered highly inflammatory because of the release of inflammatory cytokines and damage-associated molecular patterns, and are thereby not only deleterious for the dying cell itself, but also its environment or the entire organism. The relevance for these processes has been observed in various physiological and pathophysiological conditions, ranging from viral and bacterial infections over autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases to ischemic organ damage. In recent years, initialin vitroexperiments have shed light on a range of connections between necroptosis and pyroptosis. Initialin vivostudies also indicate that, in many disease models, these two forms of cell death cannot be considered individually, as they demonstrate a complex interaction. In this article, we provide an overview of the currently known structure, pathways of activation, and functions of MLKL and GSDMD. With emerging evidence for an interconnection between necroptosis and pyroptosis in not onlyin vitro, but alsoin vivomodels of disease, we highlight in particular the clinical relevance of the crosslinks between these two forms of inflammatory cell death and their implications for novel therapeutic strategies in a variety of diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据