4.7 Article

A simple protein-based surrogate neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 5, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.142362

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)
  2. QuestCap
  3. Krembil Foundation
  4. Government of Ontario
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Ontarian Government
  7. Genome Canada
  8. Ontario Genomics [OGI-139]
  9. New York State Department of Health
  10. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR 439999, FRN 162305, FDN 143301]
  11. Canada Research Chair, Tier 1, in Functional Proteomics
  12. Ontario Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most of the patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mount a humoral immune response to the virus within a few weeks of infection, but the duration of this response and how it correlates with clinical outcomes has not been completely characterized. Of particular importance is the identification of immune correlates of infection that would support public health decision-making on treatment approaches, vaccination strategies, and convalescent plasma therapy. While ELISA-based assays to detect and quantitate antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patient samples have been developed, the detection of neutralizing antibodies typically requires more demanding cell-based viral assays. Here, we present a safe and efficient protein-based assay for the detection of serum and plasma antibodies that block the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) with its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The assay serves as a surrogate neutralization assay and is performed on the same platform and in parallel with an ELISA for the detection of antibodies against the RBD, enabling a direct comparison. The results obtained with our assay correlate with those of 2 viral-based assays, a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) that uses live SARS-CoV-2 virus and a spike pseudotyped viral vector-based assay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据