4.6 Article

Ultrasensitive high-resolution profiling of early seroconversion in patients with COVID-19

期刊

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 1180-1187

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-00611-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chleck Family Foundation
  2. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness
  3. Global TravEpiNet (GTEN) system - US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [U01CK000490]
  4. NIGMS [T32GM007753]
  5. NIAID [T32AI007245, R01AI146779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multiplexed fluorescence-based assay detects seroconversion in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 from less than 1 mu l of blood as early as the day of the first positive nasopharyngeal nucleic acid test after symptom onset. Sensitive assays are essential for the accurate identification of individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here, we report a multiplexed assay for the fluorescence-based detection of seroconversion in infected individuals from less than 1 mu l of blood, and as early as the day of the first positive nucleic acid test after symptom onset. The assay uses dye-encoded antigen-coated beads to quantify the levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM and IgA antibodies against four SARS-CoV-2 antigens. A logistic regression model trained using samples collected during the pandemic and samples collected from healthy individuals and patients with respiratory infections before the first outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was 99% accurate in the detection of seroconversion in a blinded validation cohort of samples collected before the pandemic and from patients with COVID-19 five or more days after a positive nasopharyngeal test by PCR with reverse transcription. The high-throughput serological profiling of patients with COVID-19 allows for the interrogation of interactions between antibody isotypes and viral proteins, and should help us to understand the heterogeneity of clinical presentations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据