4.4 Article

Optimal burn-in policies for multiple dependent degradation processes

期刊

IISE TRANSACTIONS
卷 53, 期 11, 页码 1281-1293

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2020.1841344

关键词

Degradation-based burn-in; multiple screening points; multiple dependent degradation processes; copulas; two-stage estimation method

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [1855408]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1855408] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many complex engineering devices experience multiple dependent degradation processes. For each degradation process, there may exist substantial unit-to-unit heterogeneity. In this article, we describe the dependence structure among multiple dependent degradation processes using copulas and model unit-level heterogeneity as random effects. A two-stage estimation method is developed for statistical inference of multiple dependent degradation processes with random effects. To reduce the heterogeneity, we propose two degradation-based burn-in models, one with a single screening point and the other with multiple screening points. At each screening point, a unit is scrapped if one or more degradation levels pass their respective burn-in thresholds. Efficient algorithms are devised to find optimal burn-in decisions. We illustrate the proposed models using experimental data from light-emitting diode lamps. Impacts of parameter uncertainties on optimal burn-in decisions are investigated. Our results show that ignoring multiple dependent degradation processes can cause inferior system performance, such as increased total costs. Moreover, a higher level of dependence among multiple degradation processes often leads to longer burn-in time and higher burn-in thresholds for the two burn-in models. For the multiple-screening-point model, a higher level of dependence can also result in fewer screening points. Our results also show that burn-in with multiple screening points can lead to potential cost savings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据