4.6 Article

Wall to particle bed contact conduction heat transfer in a rotary drum using DEM

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 589-599

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-020-00356-z

关键词

Particle technology; Heat conduction; Discrete element method; Particle size distribution; Rolling friction

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy'sNational Energy Technology Laboratory (DOE NETL) Crosscutting Research Program Transitional Technology Development to Enable Highly Efficient Power Systems with Carbon Management initiative [DE-FE0026393]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that different heat transfer coefficients result from the variability in particle size distribution with the same mean and standard deviation. Monodispersed particle beds exhibit better heat transfer compared to polydispersed beds. Rotation speed has minimal impact on conduction heat transfer, while better heat transfer is achieved at lower values of rolling friction.
Contact conduction heat transfer behavior in a rotary drum using the discrete element method (DEM)-based simulation codes MFIX-DEM (open-source) and EDEM (commercial) is investigated. Simulations are performed to compare the performance of open-source and commercial code models with experimental data. This study also aims to investigate the effects of particle size distribution (PSD), rotation speed, and rolling friction on overall wall-bed heat transfer using the validated codes. It is found that the variability in the PSD with same mean,mu, and standard deviation,sigma, resulted in different heat transfer coefficients. Monodispersed particle beds exhibit better heat transfer when compared to polydispersed beds, because heat transfer is inhibited as the distribution broadens due to segregation. Rotation speed has minimal impact on conduction heat transfer. At lower values of rolling friction, particle circulation in the bed is enhanced and therefore better heat transfer is achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据