4.7 Article

Repurposing Heparin as Antimalarial: Evaluation of Multiple Modifications Toward In Vivo Application

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12090825

关键词

malaria; heparin; Plasmodium falciparum

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (FEDER funds) [BIO2014-52872-R, RTI2018-094579-B-I00, PGC2018-097583-B-I00]
  2. BIOIBERICA
  3. Gobierno de Aragon [FEDER E47-20R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparin is a promising antimalarial drug due to its activity in inhibitingPlasmodiuminvasion of red blood cells and to the lack of resistance evolution by the parasite against it, but its potent anticoagulant activity is preventing the advance of heparin along the clinical pipeline. We have determined, in in vitroPlasmodium falciparumcultures, the antimalarial activity of heparin-derived structures of different origins and sizes, to obtain formulations having a good balance of in vitro safety (neither cytotoxic nor hemolytic), low anticoagulant activity (<= 23 IU/mL according to activated partial thromboplastin time assays), and not too low antimalarial activity (IC50 at least around 100 mu g/mL). This led to the selection of five chemically modified heparins according to the parameters explored, i.e., chain length, sulfation degree and position, and glycol-split, and whose in vivo toxicity indicated their safety for mice up to an intravenous dose of 320 mg/kg. The in vivo antimalarial activity of the selected formulations was poor as a consequence of their short blood half-life. The covalent crosslinking of heparin onto the surface of polyethylene glycol-containing liposomes did not affect its antimalarial activity in vitro and provided higher initial plasma concentrations, although it did not increase mean circulation time. Finding a suitable nanocarrier to impart long blood residence times to the modified heparins described here will be the next step toward new heparin-based antimalarial strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据