4.4 Article

Screening of a genome-reduced Corynebacterium glutamicum strain library for improved heterologous cutinase secretion

期刊

MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 2020-2031

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13660

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Innovation, Science and Research within the framework of the NRW-Strategieprojekt BioSC [313/323-400-002 13]
  2. Enabling Spaces Program `Helmholtz Innovation Labs' of German Helmholtz Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of microbial platform organisms by means of genome reduction is an ongoing topic in biotechnology. In this study, we investigated whether the deletion of single or multiple gene clusters has a positive effect on the secretion of cutinase fromFusarium solani pisiin the industrial workhorseCorynebacterium glutamicum. A total of 22 genome-reduced strain variants were compared applying two Sec signal peptides fromBacillus subtilis. High-throughput phenotyping using robotics-integrated microbioreactor technology with automated harvesting revealed distinct cutinase secretion performance for a specific combination of signal peptide and genomic deletions. The biomass-specific cutinase yield for strain GRS41_51_NprE was increased by similar to 200%, although the growth rate was reduced by similar to 60%. Importantly, the causative deletions of genomic clusters cg2801-cg2828 and rrnC-cg3298 could not have been inferreda priori. Strikingly, bioreactor fed-batch cultivations at controlled growth rates resulted in a complete reversal of the screening results, with the cutinase yield for strain GRS41_51_NprE dropping by similar to 25% compared to the reference strain. Thus, the choice of bioprocess conditions may turn a 'high-performance' strain from batch screening into a 'low-performance' strain in fed-batch cultivation. In conclusion, future studies are needed in order to understand metabolic adaptations ofC. glutamicumto both genomic deletions and different bioprocess conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据