4.6 Article

Proteomic Profiling of Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Cerebrospinal Fluid of Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Pilot Study

期刊

CELLS
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells9091959

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; biomarker; cerebrospinal fluid; extracellular vesicles; proteome

资金

  1. Abbvie, Inc.
  2. Alzheimer's Association [AARF-9550302678]
  3. BrightFocus Foundation [A2016551S]
  4. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  5. NIH [RF1 AG054199, R56 AG057469, R01 AG054672, R21 NS104609]
  6. NIA [R01 AG066429]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are deposits of amyloid beta (A beta) and hyper-phosphorylated tau aggregates in brain plaques. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of A beta and tau-containing extracellular vesicles (EVs) in AD. We therefore examined EVs separated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and control (CTRL) patient samples to profile the protein composition of CSF EV. EV fractions were separated from AD (n= 13), MCI (n= 10), and CTRL (n= 10) CSF samples using MagCapture Exosome Isolation kit. The CSF-derived EV proteins were identified and quantified by label-free and tandem mass tag (TMT)-labeled mass spectrometry. Label-free proteomics analysis identified 2546 proteins that were significantly enriched for extracellular exosome ontology by Gene Ontology analysis. Canonical Pathway Analysis revealed glia-related signaling. Quantitative proteomics analysis, moreover, showed that EVs expressed 1284 unique proteins in AD, MCI and CTRL groups. Statistical analysis identified three proteins-HSPA1A, NPEPPS, and PTGFRN-involved in AD progression. In addition, the PTGFRN showed a moderate correlation with amyloid plaque (rho = 0.404,p= 0.027) and tangle scores (rho = 0.500,p= 0.005) in AD, MCI and CTRL. Based on the CSF EV proteomics, these data indicate that three proteins, HSPA1A, NPEPPS and PTGFRN, may be used to monitor the progression of MCI to AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据