4.4 Article

Parameter identification of Bouc-Wen model for Magnetorheological (MR) fluid Damper by a Novel Genetic Algorithm

期刊

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1687814020950546

关键词

Bouc-Wen Model; magnetorhelogical (MR) fluid damper; parameter identification; novel genetic algorithm

资金

  1. Core Technology Development of Subsonic Capsule Train research project, Kora Railroad Research Institute, Korea [PK2001A1A]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [PK2001A1A] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, novel genetic algorithm (nGA) is proposed for Bouc-Wen modle parameters esstimation for magnetorheological (MR) fluid dampers. The optimization efficiency is improved by modifying the crossover and mutation steps of a GA. In the crossover stage, the probability of reproducing offspring from the same parent (same mother and father chromosome) is done to be zero, which may happen in the standard GA, and the probability of a chromosome to be selected for mating is based on error rank weighting of the chromosomes. Additional fitness evaluation of chromosomes will take place in between the crossover and mutation steps to save the best chromosome found so far, which is not implemented in the standard genetic algorithm (GA). The model is validated by comparing its simulation output force (F-sim) with experimentally generated MR damper force (F-exp). The mean absolute error, standard deviation and number of generations for convergence are taken as a criterias for performance evaluation. With these ctriterias, the proposed novel GA outperform better than the other researches. The accuracy is improved by 46.67% compared to standard GA. The proposed novel GA for Bouc-Wen model parameter identification can be used for any MR damper control system with better accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据