4.7 Article

Impact of urban expansion on land surface temperature in Fuzhou, China using Landsat imagery

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102346

关键词

Remote sensing; Fuzhou; Urban heat island; Urban expansion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602301]
  2. Research and Development Program of Changle City [Y7F1021001]
  3. National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China [2018FY100300]
  4. Strategic Planning Project of the Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (IGA), Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y6H2091001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seven Landsat images were used to assess urban expansion and the corresponding thermal characteristics in Fuzhou City, China between 1985 and 2015. The urban surface thermal patterns were investigated by retrieving land surface temperature using a single-window algorithm based on atmospheric calibration. The built-up area doubled from 1985 (10.6 %) to 2015 (23.4 %), mostly from cropland conversions in the urban fringe, and was closely associated with population increase (R-2 = 0.93), gross domestic production GDP (R-2 = 0.97), and fixed asset investments (R-2 = 0.9139), illustrating the contributions of socioeconomic factors to rapid urban expansion. The daytime heating effect (heat source) in urban areas was strongly related to urban expansion, with a high percentage of an impervious surface usually associated with a high surface temperature. The average range over which wetlands affected built-up area, farmland, and road was 381, 321, and 347 m, respectively. The area of influence on construction land and road was 151 and 11 km(2), respectively, whereas the average value for farmland was 147 km(2). The area of wetland influence decreased during the study period, and therefore one explanation for the increase in the urban heat island (UHI) in Fuzhou City was the weakened cooling effect of wetland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据