4.8 Article

The many roads to mitochondrial dysfunction in neuroimmune and neuropsychiatric disorders

期刊

BMC MEDICINE
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0310-y

关键词

Autism; Bipolar disorder; Schizophrenia; Chronic fatigue syndrome; Cytokines; Depression; Immune dysfunction; Inflammatory; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Multiple sclerosis; Nitric oxide; Oxidative stress; Parkinson's disease; Peroxynitrite; Psychiatry; Neurology

资金

  1. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [1059660]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mitochondrial dysfunction and defects in oxidative metabolism are a characteristic feature of many chronic illnesses not currently classified as mitochondrial diseases. Examples of such illnesses include bipolar disorder, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, depression, autism, and chronic fatigue syndrome. Discussion: While the majority of patients with multiple sclerosis appear to have widespread mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired ATP production, the findings in patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, autism, depression, bipolar disorder schizophrenia and chronic fatigue syndrome are less consistent, likely reflecting the fact that these diagnoses do not represent a disease with a unitary pathogenesis and pathophysiology. However, investigations have revealed the presence of chronic oxidative stress to be an almost invariant finding in study cohorts of patients afforded each diagnosis. This state is characterized by elevated reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and/or reduced levels of glutathione, and goes hand in hand with chronic systemic inflammation with elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Summary: This paper details mechanisms by which elevated levels of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species together with elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines could conspire to pave a major road to the development of mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired oxidative metabolism seen in many patients diagnosed with these disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据