4.6 Review

Current Approaches to Alkyl Levulinates via Efficient Valorization of Biomass Derivatives

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00794

关键词

alkyl levulinates; levulinic acid; furfuryl alcohol; chloromethyl furfural; acidic catalysts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22065004]
  2. Basic Research Program of Guizhou Province [(2019)1009]
  3. Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Rare Animal and Economic Insects of the Mountainous Region [(2018)5102]
  4. Scientific Research Platform For Qian Ke He [(2017)5725]
  5. Joint Science and Technology Funds of the Youth Growth S&T Personnel Foundation of Guizhou Education Department [KY (2018)292]
  6. Discipline and Master's Site Construction Project of Guiyang University by Guiyang City Financial Support Guiyang University (SH-2020)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass is a potential non-food, carbon-neutral, and abundant resource, which can be used as an alternative to fossil fuels during the sustainable preparation of various platform chemicals. Alkyl levulinates (ALs) have found widespread application as flavorings, plasticizing agents, and fuel additives, as well as synthetic precursors to various building blocks. Several processes have been investigated to transform biomass and its derivatives into ALs, which mainly include: (i) direct esterification of levulinic acid (LA) with alkyl alcohols and (ii) alcoholysis reactions of renewable biomass feedstocks and their derivatives, including furfuryl alcohol (FAL), chloromethyl furfural (CMF), and saccharides. This review focuses on illustrating the effects of the biomass pretreatment step, catalyst texture, possible mechanisms, acidities, and intermediates on the synthesis of ALs from sustainable resources covering a wide range of intermediates, including diethyl ether (DEE), 4,5,5-triethoxypentan-2-one (TEP), ethoxymethylfuran (EMF), ethyl-D-fructofuranoside (EDFF), and ethyl-D-glucopyranoside (EDGP).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据