4.6 Article

Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles by Aqueous Stem Extract of Entada spiralis and Screening of Their Biomedical Activity

期刊

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00620

关键词

silver nanoparticles; biosynthesis; Entada spiralis; antibacterial assay; physicochemical parameters

资金

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [4B422, 15H73, 20H33, 20H55]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) have been established as antibacterial nanoparticles and have been innovatively developed to overcome the occurrence of antibiotic resistance in the environment. In this study, an environmentally friendly and easy method of the biosynthesis of Ag-NPs plants, mediated by aqueous extract stem extract ofEntada spiralis(E. spiralis), was successfully developed. TheE. spiralis/Ag-NPs samples were characterized using spectroscopy and the microscopic technique of UV-visible (UV-vis), X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Field Emission Transmission Electron Microscope (FETEM), zeta potential, and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analyses. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) absorption at 400-450 nm in the UV-vis spectra established the formation ofE. spiralis/Ag-NPs. The crystalline structure ofE. spiralis/Ag-NPs was displayed in the XRD analysis. The small size, around 18.49 +/- 4.23 nm, and spherical shape of Ag-NPs with good distribution was observed in the FETEM image. The best physicochemical parameters on Ag-NPs biosynthesis usingE. spiralisextract occurred at a moderate temperature (similar to 52.0 degrees C), 0.100 M of silver nitrate, 2.50 g ofE. spiralisdosage and 600 min of stirring reaction time. The antibacterial activity was tested againstStaphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, andProteus vulgarisusing an antibacterial disk diffusion assay. Based on the results, it is evident thatE. spiralis/Ag-NPs are susceptible to all the bacteria and has promising potential to be applied in both the industry and medical fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据