4.7 Article

Pristine atmospheric condition over the Third Pole: An insight from levoglucosan records

期刊

GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 851-856

出版社

CHINA UNIV GEOSCIENCES, BEIJING
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.003

关键词

Pristine atmospheric condition; Levoglucosan; Third Pole; Glacier; Mid-troposphere

资金

  1. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2020071]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [YIPA-2020071, XDA20060200]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41701078, 41805127]
  4. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research [2019QZKK0201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that levoglucosan concentration in the mid-troposphere over the Third Pole is significantly lower than neighboring densely-populated Asian regions, indicating that the Third Pole still has relatively pristine atmospheric conditions and is one of the cleanest remote regions on Earth.
Expanding urbanization and agricultural intensification across neighboring South Asia and East Asia have substantially threatened atmospheric condition over the Third Pole (TP) during the past few decades. Whether the atmospheric condition over the TP is still as dean as a representative of the regional background draws great concern. In this work, great differences in levoglucosan concentration within/above the atmospheric boundary layer height are revealed. Levoglucosan results support the hypothesis that atmospheric pollutants in the mid-troposphere over the TP are mainly affected by long-range transport, although there are some local biomass burning emissions in residential areas. In addition, levoglucosan concentration in the midtroposphere over the TP is at the same magnitude as marine and polar regions, but about 2-3 magnitudes lower than neighboring densely-populated Asian regions. With insights of levoglucosan records, this work therefore proves that the high-altitude TP still has largely pristine atmospheric conditions, and is one of the cleanest remote regions on the Earth. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据