4.7 Article Data Paper

Air pollution emissions from Chinese power plants based on the continuous emission monitoring systems network

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00665-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [71622011]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71971007, 71988101, 11771012]
  3. National Programme for Support of Top Notch Young Professionals
  4. National Research Programme for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control [DQGG0209-07]
  5. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFE0194500]
  6. Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering Ministry of Ecology and Environment [2019-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To meet the growing electricity demand, China's power generation sector has become an increasingly large source of air pollutants. Specific control policymaking needs an inventory reflecting the overall, heterogeneous, time-varying features of power plant emissions. Due to the lack of comprehensive real measurements, existing inventories rely on average emission factors that suffer from many assumptions and high uncertainty. This study is the first to develop an inventory of particulate matter (PM), SO2 and NOX emissions from power plants using systematic actual measurements monitored by China's continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) network over 96-98% of the total thermal power capacity. With nationwide, source-level, real-time CEMS-monitored data, this study directly estimates emission factors and absolute emissions, avoiding the use of indirect average emission factors, thereby reducing the level of uncertainty. This dataset provides plant-level information on absolute emissions, fuel uses, generating capacities, geographic locations, etc. The dataset facilitates power emission characterization and clean air policy-making, and the CEMS-based estimation method can be employed by other countries seeking to regulate their power emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据