4.5 Article

Effect of CNT on microstructural properties of Zn2SiO4/CNT composite via dry powder processing

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/abbbcb

关键词

carbon nanotubes; zinc silicate; crystallite size; lattice strain; willemite

资金

  1. Malaysia Ministry of Education (MoE) through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS/1/2018/STG07/UPM/02/3, 5540132]
  2. Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) under Inisiatif Putra Muda [GP-IPM/2017/9543800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work focused on the influence of carbon nanotubes (CNT) to the microstructural properties of Zn2SiO4/CNT (ZSO/CNT) composite. CNT was synthesized via alcohol catalytic chemical vapor deposition (ACCVD) using cobalt oxide as catalyst and ethanol as carbon source. Zinc silicate (ZSO) glass was prepared from quenching the melted commercial waste glass bottle with zinc oxide powder. ZSO/CNT-x composites with various CNT concentration (0, 1, 2 and 3 wt%) was prepared through introducing CNT into ZSO glass via dry processing technique followed by sintering process in Argon gas (Ar) environment and atmospheric (atm) environment, respectively. FESEM, XRD and EDS were employed to determine the surface morphology, phase composition and elemental distribution of sintered sample. Crystallite trigonal willemite (Zn2SiO4) phase was observed from argon sintered sample and the crystallite size of willemite phase in ZSO/CNT-3/Ar showed the most reduced lattice strain of 22.85% compared to ZSO/CNT-0/Ar. In contrast, semi-crystalline phase exhibited in atmospheric sintered sample resulted in high lattice strain. It is concluded that dry powder processing and inert gas thermal treatment can be an effective technique in fabricating strain-reduced ceramics/CNT composite without alternating the domain phase. Least internal strain in crystal lattice have potential on enhancing the luminescence properties of phosphor material and lattice thermal conductivity of thermoelectric material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据