4.5 Article

Testing Strategies and Predictors for Evaluating Immediate and Delayed Reactions to Cephalosporins

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.056

关键词

Cephalosporin; Beta-lactam; Immediate hypersensitivity; Allergy; Penicillin; Skin testing; Cross-reactivity

资金

  1. AHRQ [1K12HS026395-01]
  2. NIH/NHLBI [T32 HL87738]
  3. NIH/NIGMS [T32 GM007569]
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) postgraduate scholarship [GNT 1139902]
  5. National Centre for Infections in Cancer
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council
  7. BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford [GNT 1116876]
  8. National Institutes of Health [1P50GM115305-01, R21AI139021, R34AI136815]
  9. National Health and Medical Research Foundation of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that cross-reactivity of cephalosporins is based on shared R1 groupings, and increasing time since the original reaction and having a penicillin allergy label (PAL) with unknown cephalosporin tolerance predicted a lower likelihood of positive skin testing.
BACKGROUND: Although 1% to 2% of the general population carries a cephalosporin allergy label (CAL), we lack validated testing strategies and predictors of true allergy. OBJECTIVE: To identify cross-reactivity patterns and predictors of skin test positive (STP) in geographically disparate patients with a CAL. METHODS: A total of 780 adult patients labeled with a CAL or penicillin allergy label (PAL) with unknown tolerance of cephalosporins identified from the Austin Hospital (Melbourne, Australia) (n = 410) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Nashville, TN) (n = 370) between 2014 and 2018 underwent a standardized skin testing. RESULTS: Of 328 patients with a CAL, 29 (8.8%) tested STP to >= 1 cephalosporin(s). There were no cefazolin or ceftriaxone STP, 0 of 452 (0%), in patients with a PAL only. Of 328 patients with a CAL, 16 (4.8%) were ampicillin STP. Eleven of 16 of these patients had an initial allergy label to cephalexin. Twenty of 29 cephalosporin STP patients demonstrated tolerance to a cephalosporin with a different R1 side chain, and 8 of 14 ampicillin STP patients demonstrated tolerance to >= 1 non-amino R1 group cephalosporin. Eleven of 13 patients STP to cefazolin were skin and ingestion challenge negative to all other penicillins and cephalosporins predicted by its distinct R1/R2 groups. Seven of 15 ceftriaxone STP patients demonstrated cross-reactivity with R1-similar cephalosporins. Time since the original reaction predicted STP testing to both penicillins, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per year 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90, 0.97), and cephalosporins, aOR per year 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Cephalosporin cross-reactivity is based on shared R1 groupings. Increasing time since the original reaction and the presence of a PAL with unknown cephalosporin tolerance predict a lower likelihood of cephalosporin STP. (C) 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据