4.7 Article

Impedance-Based Analysis of Interconnected Power Electronics Systems: Impedance Network Modeling and Comparative Studies of Stability Criteria

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JESTPE.2019.2914560

关键词

Impedance; Stability criteria; Circuit stability; Power system stability; Power electronics; Integrated circuit modeling; Converter; criterion; impedance; network; stability

资金

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology Energy [81617922]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51837007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impedance is an intuitive and effective way for dynamical representation of power electronics devices [e.g., voltage source converters (VSCs)]. One of its strengths toward others is the natural association with circuits. However, impedances of VSCs are locally evaluated via linearization, a process dependent on the angle of the reference frame; thus, the reference frame transformation (i.e., rotation) is required before connecting them in circuits for the purpose of network analysis. Although this issue was properly treated in the state-space modeling, a counterpart for the impedance-based analysis, particularly the stability impacts of this rotation, has not been thoroughly discussed and worth being clarified. On the other hand, there are fundamental differences in applying the impedance-based stability criteria of a single-VSC system to an interconnected one. Several restrictions as revealed (e.g., sensitivity to partition points of the Nyquist-based analysis), if not properly considered, may lead to inaccurate stability assessments. In this respect, a clarification of three commonly employed impedance-based stability criteria is achieved. At last, the capability of the Nyquist-based analysis in identifying the system's weak point and in facilitating better network design and planning is presented. All the models and analyses are verified by frequency-scanning and time-domain simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据