4.8 Article

Excessive Neutrophils and Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in COVID-19

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02063

关键词

coronavirus; COVID-19; neutrophil extracellular trap; pneumonia; neutrophilia; lymphopenia

资金

  1. foundation of Wuxi Medical Development Discipline for Infectious Disease [FZXK006]
  2. Wuxi Young Medical Talents [QNRC072]
  3. Health and Science Bureau of Wuxi [MS201731, CSE31N1712, Q201743]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background:Cases of excessive neutrophil counts in the blood in severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients have drawn significant attention. Neutrophil infiltration was also noted on the pathological findings from autopsies. It is urgent to clarify the pathogenesis of neutrophils leading to severe pneumonia in COVID-19. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 55 COVID-19 patients classified as mild (n= 22), moderate (n= 25), and severe (n= 8) according to the Guidelines released by the National Health Commission of China. Trends relating leukocyte counts and lungs examined by chest CT scan were quantified by Bayesian inference. Transcriptional signatures of host immune cells of four COVID19 patients were analyzed by RNA sequencing of lung specimens and BALF. Results:Neutrophilia occurred in 6 of 8 severe patients at 7-19 days after symptom onset, coinciding with lesion progression. Increasing neutrophil counts paralleled lesion CT values (slope: 0.8 and 0.3-1.2), reflecting neutrophilia-induced lung injury in severe patients. Transcriptome analysis revealed that neutrophil activation was correlated with 17 neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-associated genes in COVID-19 patients, which was related to innate immunity and interacted with T/NK/B cells, as supported by a protein-protein interaction network analysis. Conclusion:Excessive neutrophils and associated NETs could explain the pathogenesis of lung injury in COVID-19 pneumonia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据