4.8 Review

Emerging Concepts and Technologies in Vaccine Development

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.583077

关键词

non-viral DNA-RNA vaccines; nanoparticle vaccines; virus-like particle vaccines; cancer vaccines; substance abuse; noncommunicable disease; infectious disease; COVID19

资金

  1. NIH NIAID [R01 AI131586]
  2. USDA-NIFA-Capacity Funds (Hatch and Animal Health)
  3. University of Minnesota School of Medicine Academic Investment Research Program (AIRP)
  4. COVID-19 Rapid Response Funds
  5. USDA-NIFA AFRI grant [2019-05384]
  6. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Rapid Agricultural Response Fund
  7. NIH [T32 DA007097]
  8. NIH T32 training grant in ComparativeMedicine and Pathology [5T32 OD010993-17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the success of vaccination to greatly mitigate or eliminate threat of diseases caused by pathogens, there are still known diseases and emerging pathogens for which the development of successful vaccines against them is inherently difficult. In addition, vaccine development for people with compromised immunity and other pre-existing medical conditions has remained a major challenge. Besides the traditional inactivated or live attenuated, virus-vectored and subunit vaccines, emerging non-viral vaccine technologies, such as viral-like particle and nanoparticle vaccines, DNA/RNA vaccines, and rational vaccine design, offer innovative approaches to address existing challenges of vaccine development. They have also significantly advanced our understanding of vaccine immunology and can guide future vaccine development for many diseases, including rapidly emerging infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, and diseases that have not traditionally been addressed by vaccination, such as cancers and substance abuse. This review provides an integrative discussion of new non-viral vaccine development technologies and their use to address the most fundamental and ongoing challenges of vaccine development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据