4.4 Review

The lung in rheumatoid arthritis, cause or consequence?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 76-82

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000238

关键词

anticitrullinated protein antibodies; lungs; rheumatoid arthritis; rheumatoid factor

资金

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  2. Innovative Medicine Initiative BTCure [115142-2]
  3. FP7-HEALTH-INNOVATION-1 Euro-TEAM [305549-2]
  4. Initial Training Networks 7th framework program Osteoimmune [289150]
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. Stockholm County Council
  7. Karolinska Institutet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of reviewRecent discoveries implicate the lungs as a possible extra-articular mucosal site for initiating rheumatoid arthritis-associated immunity.Recent findingsIndividuals at risk for developing arthritis and patients with early untreated rheumatoid arthritis show signs of lung involvement on high-resolution computer tomography. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated antibodies are present in patients with respiratory complains such as bronchiectasis and unexplained dyspnea even in the absence of joint disease and might predict future development of rheumatoid arthritis in these patients. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated antibodies are detected in the sputum of individuals at risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis but not yet having disease. Signs of bronchial mucosal inflammation with germinal center formation and local production of antibodies have been described in patients with early untreated rheumatoid arthritis. Shared antigenic targets have been identified and characterized in the lungs and joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients.SummaryRecent findings support an important role for the lung as a mucosal extra-articular place were inflammation induced by external triggers (such as smoking) leads to tolerance break and generation of rheumatoid arthritis-specific immunity already before disease onset with only secondary targeting of the joints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据