4.7 Article

The Widespread Environmental Footprint of Indigo Denim Microfibers from Blue Jeans

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 7, 期 11, 页码 840-847

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00498

关键词

-

资金

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada (Great Lakes Protection Initiative) [GCE19P16]
  2. Fisheries and Oceans Canada [MECTS 3789711]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2017-06654]
  4. Northern Contaminants Program, University of Toronto Faculty of Arts and Sciences fund
  5. Ocean Conservancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At any moment, approximately half of the world's population is wearing blue jeans and other denim garments. We examine the footprint of our modern blue jean society by investigating the environmental distribution, pathways, and sources of indigo denim microfibers shed by denim clothing. Microfibers comprised 87-90% of the anthropogenic particles found in sediments from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Laurentian Great Lakes, and shallow suburban lakes in southern Ontario. Twenty-one to fifty-one percent of all microfibers in sediments were anthropogenically modified cellulose (AC), of which 40-57% were indigo denim microfibers (12-23% of all microfibers analyzed). AC microfibers were also found in rainbow smelt from the Great Lakes. Wastewater treatment plant effluent collected in southern Ontario contained 22 +/- 18 microfibers L-1, 13% of which were dyed with indigo, characteristic of denim fabrics. Finally, as a source for introduction into wastewater, we found that one pair of used jeans can release 56000 +/- 4100 microfibers per wash. Microfibers from jean laundering were consistent in chemical composition and morphology with those found in the environment. We conclude that blue jeans, the world's single most popular garment, are an indicator of the widespread burden of anthropogenic pollution by adding significantly to the environmental accumulation of microfibers from temperate to Arctic regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据