4.7 Article

Integrating ecosystem services within spatial biodiversity conservation prioritization in the Alps

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101186

关键词

Economic valuation; alpha-diversity; Human-nature trade-off; Spatial prioritization; Conservation planning; Decision support tool; Zonation software

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [31003A-1528661, CR23I2_162754]
  2. Center for Interdisciplinary Mountain Studies (CIRM) of the University of Lausanne

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As anthropogenic degradation of biodiversity and ecosystems increases, so does the potential threat to the supply of ecosystem services, a key contribution of nature to people. Biodiversity has often been used in spatial conservation planning and has been regarded as one among multiple services delivered by ecosystems. Hence, biodiversity conservation planning should be integrated in a framework of prioritizing services in order to inform decision-making. Here, we propose a prioritization approach based on scenarios maximising both the provision of ecosystem services and the conservation of biodiversity hotspots. Different weighting scenarios for the alpha-diversity in four taxonomic groups and 10 mapped ecosystem services were used to simulate varying priorities of policymakers in a mountain region. Our results illustrate how increasing priorities to ecosystem services can be disadvantageous to biodiversity. Moreover, the analysis to identify priority areas that best compromise the conservation of alpha-diversity and ecosystem services are predominantly not located within the current protected area network. Our analyses stress the need for an appropriate weighting of biodiversity within decision making that seek to integrate multiple ecosystem services. Our study paves the way toward further integration of multiple biodiversity groups and components, ecosystem services and various socio-economic scenarios, ultimately fuelling the development of more informed, evidence-based spatial planning decisions for conservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据