4.6 Article

Characterization of Fibrous Mordenite: A First Step for the Evaluation of Its Potential Toxicity

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst10090769

关键词

mordenite; mineral fibers; erionite; potential toxicity

资金

  1. project Fibers a Multidisciplinary Mineralogical, Crystal-Chemical and Biological Project to Amend the Paradigm of Toxicity and Cancerogenicity of Mineral Fibers (PRIN: PROGETTI DI RICERCA DI RILEVANTE INTERESSE NAZIONALE-Bando 2017) [20173X8WA4]
  2. project CCIAARE-Attuazione di un progetto di accompagnamento delle imprese nell'ambito del progetto PID impresa 4.0 - Camera di Commercio di Reggio Emilia (Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In nature, a huge number of unregulated minerals fibers share the same characteristics as asbestos and therefore have potential adverse health effects. However, in addition to asbestos minerals, only fluoro-edenite and erionite are currently classified as toxic/pathogenic agents by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Mordenite is one of the most abundant zeolites in nature and commonly occurs with a fibrous crystalline habit. The goal of this paper is to highlight how fibrous mordenite shares several common features with the well-known carcinogenic fibrous erionite. In particular, this study has shown that the morphology, biodurability, and surface characteristics of mordenite fibers are similar to those of erionite and asbestos. These properties make fibrous mordenite potentially toxic and exposure to its fibers can be associated with deadly diseases such as those associated with regulated mineral fibers. Since the presence of fibrous mordenite concerns widespread geological formations, this mineral fiber should be considered dangerous for health and the precautionary approach should be applied when this material is handled. Future in vitro and in vivo tests are necessary to provide further experimental confirmation of the outcome of this work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据