4.4 Review

Gamma band oscillations: a key to understanding schizophrenia symptoms and neural circuit abnormalities

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 202-210

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000244

关键词

parvalbumin; interneurons; gamma band oscillations; N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; schizophrenia

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
  2. National Institute of Health [R01 MH039683]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review We review our current understanding of abnormal gamma band oscillations in schizophrenia, their association with symptoms and the underlying cortical circuit abnormality, with a particular focus on the role of fast-spiking parvalbumin gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurons in the disease state. Recent findings Clinical electrophysiological studies of schizophrenia patients and pharmacological models of the disorder show an increase in spontaneous gamma band activity (not stimulus-evoked) measures. These findings provide a crucial link between preclinical and clinical work examining the role of gamma band activity in schizophrenia. MRI-based experiments measuring cortical GABA provides evidence supporting impaired GABAergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia patients, which is correlated with gamma band activity level. Several studies suggest that stimulation of the cortical circuitry, directly or via subcortical structures, has the potential to modulate cortical gamma activity, and improve cognitive function. Abnormal gamma band activity is observed in patients with schizophrenia and disease models in animals, and is suggested to underlie the psychosis and cognitive/perceptual deficits. Convergent evidence from both clinical and preclinical studies suggest the central factor in gamma band abnormalities is impaired GABAergic neurotransmission, particularly in a subclass of neurons which express parvalbumin. Rescue of gamma band abnormalities presents an intriguing option for therapeutic intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据