4.6 Article

Blast Vibration Control in A Hydropower Station for the Safety of Adjacent Structure

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10186195

关键词

hydropower station; cofferdam; blast vibration; vibration attenuation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transverse cofferdam in Xiangjiaba hydropower station was a water retaining concrete structure with a length of 126 m, a width of 12 m, and a height of 25.2 m, consisting of masonry, plain concrete structure (PC), and roller compacted concrete (RCC), which had to be demolished by blasting after the dam was built. There were many precise instruments nearby the cofferdam which had strict restrictions on blasting vibration. Therefore, the cofferdam was divided into six blasting regions, including land blasting and underwater blasting. Blasting parameters and blasting network structure were accurately designed and continuously optimized through blast-induced vibration test results. At nine measurement points in different locations, 57 blast vibration data were recorded. Consequently, 1386 holes with an explosive weight of 9641.3 kg were detonated in land blasting. The highest levels of vibration were recorded as 8.74 cm/s in the desilting tunnel on the right of the cofferdam. The explosives up to 11887.7 kg were detonated in an underwater blasting. According to the analysis of the law of vibration attenuation, the blast vibration value was reduced to 7.65 cm/s. The results showed that the research on the attenuation law of blasting vibration can effectively increase the charge weight per delay and control the blast-induced vibration. Consequently, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of underwater blasting could be predicted by analyzing the PPV of land blasting in same structure, which provided the basis for the design of underwater blasting parameters. A reliable method for cofferdam demolition in hydropower station was proposed, which provided a reference for similar projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据