3.8 Article

Acute Implantation of Aligned Hydrogel Tubes Supports Delayed Spinal Progenitor Implantation

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 5771-5784

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00844

关键词

spinal cord injury; neural stem cells; biomaterials; tissue engineering

资金

  1. NIH [R01EB005678]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important role of neural stem cell transplantation is repopulating neural and glial cells that actively promote repair following spinal cord injury (SCI). However, stem cell survival after transplantation is severely hampered by the inflammatory environment that arises after SCI. Biomaterials have a demonstrated history of managing post-SCI inflammation and can serve as a vehicle for stem cell delivery. In this study, we utilize macroporous polyethylene glycol (PEG) tubes, which were previously found to modulate the post-SCI microenvironment, to serve as a viable, soft substrate for injecting mouse embryonic day 14 (E14) spinal progenitors 2 weeks after tube implantation into a mouse SCI model. At 2 weeks after transplantation (4 weeks after injury), 4.3% of transplanted E14 spinal progenitors survived when transplanted directly into tubes compared to 0.7% when transplanted into the injury alone. Surviving E14 spinal progenitors exhibited a commitment to the neuronal lineage at 4 weeks post-injury, as assessed by both early and late phenotypic markers. Mice receiving tubes with E14 spinal progenitor transplantations had on average 21 +/- 4 axons/mm(2) regenerated compared to 8 +/- 1 axons/mm(2) for the injury only control, which corresponded with a significant increase in remyelination compared to the injury only control, while all conditions exhibited improved forelimb control 4 weeks after injury compared to the injury only. Collectively, we have demonstrated the feasibility of using PEG tubes to modify the implantation site and improve survival of transplanted E14 spinal progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据