4.6 Review

Functionalized layered double hydroxide applied to heavy metal ions absorption: A review

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 800-819

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ntrev-2020-0065

关键词

LDH; intercalation; surface modification; loading on substrates; selective absorption; wastewater

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872273]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Reuse for Building Materials [SWR-2020-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of functional material can help mitigate the pollution by heavy metals, which presents an array of risks to human production and life. This work provides a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on functionalized layered double hydroxide (LDH) as a heavy metal absorption material, by synthesizing the information from a total of 141 relevant publications published since 2005. LDH provides a potentially highly efficient method to adsorb heavy metal ions, which is simple to prepare and of low cost. The lack of functional groups and structural components of pristine LDH, however, limits the absorption capacity and widespread applications of LDH. Through intercalation, surfacemodification, or loading on substrates, functional groups or structural components are introduced into the pristine LDH to prepare functionalized LDH. In this process, the hydroxyl group and the valence state of [Mg (OH)(6)] octahedrons play a crucial role. Functionalized LDH can be endowed with selective absorption capacity and enhanced stability and recyclability. After adsorbing heavy metal ions, functionalized LDH can be readily separated from the liquid phase. These aspects are discussed, along with the structure and composition, shape and size, and synthesis methods and research tools of LDH. This work concludes with the discussion of preparation and utilization and a look to the future in terms of identified research needs regarding the preparation, use, and recycling (or upcycling) of economical and environmental-friendly LDH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据