4.6 Article

R2 and Non-Site-Specific R2-Like Retrotransposons of the German Cockroach, Blattella germanica

期刊

GENES
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes11101202

关键词

R2 non-LTR retrotransposons; protein domain organization; recombination; mobile element activity; ribosomal RNA gene cluster; 5′ -truncated copies; population structure

资金

  1. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics Russian Academy of Sciences
  2. Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Program Biodiversity of natural systems and biological resources of Russia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural and functional organization of the ribosomal RNA gene cluster and the full-length R2 non-LTR retrotransposon (integrated into a specific site of 28S ribosomal RNA genes) of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica, is described. A partial sequence of the R2 retrotransposon of the cockroach Rhyparobia maderae is also analyzed. The analysis of previously published next-generation sequencing data from the B. germanica genome reveals a new type of retrotransposon closely related to R2 retrotransposons but with a random distribution in the genome. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that these newly described retrotransposons form a separate clade. It is shown that proteins corresponding to the open reading frames of newly described retrotransposons exhibit unequal structural domains. Within these retrotransposons, a recombination event is described. New mechanism of transposition activity is discussed. The essential structural features of R2 retrotransposons are conserved in cockroaches and are typical of previously described R2 retrotransposons. However, the investigation of the number and frequency of 5 '-truncated R2 retrotransposon insertion variants in eight B. germanica populations suggests recent mobile element activity. It is shown that the pattern of 5 '-truncated R2 retrotransposon copies can be an informative molecular genetic marker for revealing genetic distances between insect populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据